Skip to content
Academic Quality Services
Assuring Quality – Driving Innovation
Home
Meet the AQS Team
Management Team
Portfolio Development, Approval & Review Team
External Engagement Team
Regulations, Systems and Communications Team
Operations and Support Team
About AQS
Contact Us
Quality Assurance
Codes of Practice
Collaborative Partnerships
Core Principles of Collaborative Partnerships
An Overview of Collaborative Partnership Development, Management and Review
Development and Approval Process for the New Collaborative Partnership/ Programme
Partnership Termination Process
External Examiners
Appointment of External Examiners
Appointment Criteria
The Role of the External Examiner
Information and Support
External Examiners’ Reports
Paying Fees and Expenses
Guidelines for Reciprocal Arrangements for External Examining
Learning, Teaching and Assessment
Core Principles & Strategy
Code of Practice Themes
Approaches to Inclusive Learning and Teaching
Approaches to Inclusive Assessment and Feedback
Research-Led, Practice-Driven Learning
Technology Enhanced Learning
Student Professional and Academic Development
Student Opportunities
Postgraduate Research
Quality Assurance of Postgraduate Research Programmes
Postgraduate Research Programmes: Student Admissions and Candidature
Changing, Extending or Suspending Postgraduate Research Programmes
Employment of Research Students
Training and Development
The Research Environment and Community
Supervision of Postgraduate Research Students
Assessment of Research Degrees
Additional Information for Research Students
Programme Design, Development, Approval and Review
Designing, Developing and Approving New Programmes of Study
Concept and Business Planning Phase
Market Intelligence
Proposal Phase
Development Phase
Approval Phase
Post Approval
Developing a Programme with a Partner (Collaborative Programmes)
Postgraduate Research Programmes of Study
Amending an Existing Programme
Suspending or Withdrawing a Programme
Developing New Modules & Reviewing and Enhancing Modules
The Quality Review Process
Annual Module Review
Annual Programme Review (APR)
The Quality Review Process Explained
Annual Portfolio Review
Policies
University Handbooks
Committees and Boards
Academic Advisory Committee (AAC)
Academic Data Quality Committee (ADQC)
Academic Regulations and Cases Board (ARCB)
Collaborative Partnerships Board (CPB)
Learning, Teaching and Quality Committee (LTQC)
Postgraduate Research Committee (PGRC)
Programme Approval Committee (PAC)
Programme Management Board (PMB)
Effective Practice
Academic Support
Active Learning
Authentic Assessment
Audience Participation
Discussion
Experiential Learning
Flipped Learning
Formative Assessment
Group Work
Inclusivity
Interactive Activities
Large Student Numbers
Learning Community
Lecture
Peer Learning
Practical Language Sessions
Questioning
Seminar
Small Student Numbers
Story Telling
Student Engagement
Technology Enhanced Learning
Virtual Reality
Workshops
Students
Student Review Community
My External Examiner Report
Documents Hub
News
FAQs
Developing New Programmes
Establishing Proof of Concept
Market Assessment & Programme Viability and Submission
Programme Management Board (PMB)
Designing a New Programme of Study
Externality: The role of External Subject Specialists and Employers
Professional Body Reports
Learning, Teaching and Assessment
Submitting the Programme Proposal
Programme Approval Process
Programme Approval Committee (PAC)
The Post-Approval Process
Developing a Collaborative Partnership/ Programme
Risk Assessment and Risk Management
Contractual Agreements
Review of Collaborative Partnerships
Areas of Responsibility
Division of Responsibilities for Development of a Collaborative Partnership/Programme
Definitions
Managing and Enhancing the Portfolio and Programmes of Study
Developing New Modules & Reviewing and Enhancing Modules
Amending an Existing Programme
Annual Programme Review (APR FAQs)
Quality Review Process
